Pain Management Physicians: 4 Helpful Reminders Before You Refuse, Reduce or Discharge

Here are four helpful reminders for pain management physicians before refusing, reducing or discharging a patient who is on opioid medication. For regular healthcare defense updates follow "the Healthcare Defendant" on Twitter @healthcaredef 1. Addiction is Not a Crime Its a Disease Addiction is not a crime, it's a disease. Dependence is a common occurrence when any patient is on a long term stable dose of opioid medication. Signs of addiction must not be punished, but rather, should be treated as any other disease - with treatment. The proper course of action is to treat a dual diagnosis patient for addiction and pain. As a last resort, referral to an addiction medicine clinic may be helpful. When pain management providers discharge patients who present with signs of addiction instead of assisting them - its actually evidence that the provider is not legitimate and fearful of government interaction. It tells investigators and regulators that the doctor does not care enough about the patient to ensure their dual diagnosis is treated. 2. Fear is Not a Substitute for Medical Judgment Many prescribers cite CDC guidelines or the DEA as a reason that they need to reduce a patient's medication or decline to prescribe an appropriate dose of pain medications. This is akin to telling a patient "the Government is making me do it". This type of treatment utilizes fear instead of compassion and misunderstands the fundamental reasons doctors are being targeted during the opioid epidemic. Providers are not being targeted for their compassion, they are being targeted for abandoning patient care and adhering to poorly documented cookie cutter treatment modalities. Prescribers who listen to their patients, prescribe an appropriate dose of medication, followup at regular intervals, progress treatment using multiple modalities, and properly document - are easily defensible regardless of the dose of medication or "MME". 3. Discharge is a Last Resort Discharging a patient should only be done when the provider is convinced that the patient has engaged in drug diversion and the patient does not actually need the medication. This can be the result of multiple negative urine drug screens or an admission of sale of the medication, etc. Signs of dependence, addiction, overuse, dose escalation, etc. are signs of psuedo-addiction and may actually be a symptom of a greater pain problem. These signs must be well documented and handled appropriately. To be blunt, summarily discharging every high risk patient is harmful and lazy. Furthermore, it's actually a sign that the provider may not be legitimately providing patient care. 4. Under Treatment is Malpractice When a patient comes into your office seeking treatment and establishes a physician patient relationship with a provider, the provider takes on the obligation to treat the patient in accordance with ethical standards and the Hippocratic oath. This means that the patient is entitled to an individual assessment of his or her condition and individualized treatment. Under-treatment for fear of exceeding federal "recommendations" such as the CDC guidelines is malpractice. Leaving a patient in pain for fear of government investigation, board complaint, or scrutiny is improper. Physicians have a duty to individually assess and treat pain and if the physician does not feel comfortable doing so, he or she should refer the patient to a provider who can. For regular healthcare defense updates follow "the Healthcare Defendant" on Twitter @healthcaredef

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • White Facebook Icon

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.  Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information.  Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.  Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.  Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers. The views expressed at, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities.  All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed.  The content on this posting is provided "as is;" no representations are made that the content is error-free.